I think
one of the most interesting aspects of this article, is that it confirms
something I’ve suspected but have never been able to verbalize: emerging
adulthood exists in multiple forms, or it doesn’t exist at all. I think I agree
most with the critical perspective offered on the left column of the last page:
“if emerging adulthood can be many things, then it is nothing in particular.”
Of course, there is no set path for people once they have finished high school,
but the fact that there are so many different paths and routes to the abstract
concept of “adulthood,” and all take varying amount of times, the idea of “emerging
adulthood” seems to me that it has been generalizes almost to the point that it
is useless.
An aspect
of this article, and our unit, that needs to be expanded on is the history of
emerging adulthood. Sheehy presented the idea that advancements in modern
medicine and overall quality of life improvements due to industrialization have
led to longer life-spans, and as a result, more life stages. However, the idea
presented in this article, is that emerging adulthood has always existed,
except for the Baby Boomer generation which experienced an anomaly due to a massive
economic boom. Sheehy also argued that completion of passages is determined internally,
however this article mentions that many people found the promotion to adult to
coincide with the birth of their first child. This seems like too big of a
coincidence, and I would argue that it shows evidence that completion of a
passage into adulthood may be external, or at least more external than Sheehy
presented.
No comments:
Post a Comment